Jeremiah 15.15-21
Romans 12:9-21
Matthew 16:21-28
Poor old St Peter! Last week he
got it right, and proclaimed Jesus as the Messiah, the Son of the Living God.
But this week he gets it spectacularly wrong. Jesus begins to tell the
disciples what the Messiah must do: he must go to Jerusalem, and undergo great
suffering, and be killed, and on the third day be raised. To the disciples,
this is shocking and incomprehensible. How can such things happen to the
Messiah, God’s anointed leader?
So Peter, full of the new
authority that Jesus had given him, rebukes Jesus for his words. “God forbid
it, Lord! This must never happen to you.”
Jesus’ reply is one of the most
memorable lines of scripture: “Get behind me, Satan! You are a stumbling-block
to me.” Those words aren’t just random insults uttered in exasperation. They
have a precise meaning. Satan is the tempter, the one who came to Jesus in the
desert and offered him all the kingdoms of this world, if Jesus would but
worship him. A stumbling-block, in Greek, is skandalon, a scandal, which is not
just something you trip over, but something that both attracts and repels, that
you keep bumping into but can’t get around, like a moth dive-bombing a light
bulb. This is why scandals are so endlessly fascinating.
So if Peter is a scandal and a
Satan, this means he is a tempter, and he is offering Jesus something that both
attracts and repels. What is that? It is the alternative to the way of the
cross, Peter’s version of the Messiah. The Messiah who does not have to suffer.
The Messiah who will impose the Kingdom by conquest and drive out the
unrighteous and unclean. This is exactly what Satan offered in the desert, and
he offers it again here in the subtle disguise of Peter’s words, “this must never
happen to you.” How reasonable St Peter’s view seems to be, how powerful a
temptation.
But he is setting his mind not
on divine things but on human things. He is thinking the way the world thinks. “This
must not happen to you” implies that
it’s not so bad if it happens to someone else. Indeed, that is Peter’s
expectation of what will happen once the Messiah has conquered his enemies.
This is the whole human way of
thinking: vengeance and violence, finding scapegoats, driving out those we
think are not like us. Jesus has come to undo the whole human way of thinking
and being, founded on violence and casting out. But in the world as it is that
can only be done from within, by entering into the heart of human violence as
its victim, and suffering it. Anything else, imposing a different view by
force, would just be an alternative violent order. This is how radical the
gospel is. This is how necessary the cross is. And this, in its turn, is a
scandal, a stumbling-block, to the disciples.
Jesus “must” suffer, not
because the Father wills suffering, but because it is inevitable within the
human order as it is. St Paul in today’s extract from Romans talks about wrath,
as he often does. But this “wrath” is not “of God”, that is a mistranslation and
the words “of God” are not there in the Greek. Paul is describing as Godly the
path of non-violence that renounces revenge, and that would not make sense if
wrath was something that was in God.
Rather, wrath is the
destructive power we experience when we choose to stay within the human order
as it is, instead of letting God free us from it in Jesus. Jesus experienced
that destructive power himself, for us, on the cross. Wrath is not God’s
violence, for there is no violence in God, but the heart of human violence. God
in Christ placed himself in the heart of our violence to save us from
ourselves.
This can only be understood in
the light of the resurrection. All the gospels tell of the disciples’ failure
to understand, and all, of course, were written after and because of the
resurrection. Peter is rebuked – but he is not rejected or sent away. The call
of the Lord to him does not change. He is rebuked so that he can return to the
right path and continue to follow Jesus – along the way of the cross, which is
also the way of resurrection.
The Church, like individual
disciples, can and does get it wrong. Jesus gathered a community to himself to
carry on his mission until eternity, and gave them – us – the task of proclaiming
the Kingdom of God. But so often, like Peter, the Church thinks it can decide
what the Kingdom is to be. It faces the same temptation as Jesus faced in the
wilderness, the temptation presented to him again by Peter today. The
temptation is to define the Kingdom of God in terms of the old human
understanding of violence and exclusion. And the Church, like Peter, often
fails the test. When it does so it becomes a scandal and a Satan – an obstacle
in the path of the Kingdom, and a temptation to turn aside.
The history of the Church is
littered with accommodations made with the way the world thinks, apparently for
the sake of the gospel, which actually betrayed the gospel. We may think of how
the Church in Germany mostly failed to see the true nature of Hitler’s rise to
power behind the smokescreen of social order and German greatness, and was only
too willing to go along with it. Or in our own day, when Uganda is trying to
enact violently oppressive anti-gay laws, which are nothing but scapegoating,
with the active encouragement of the local bishops – and little criticism from
the Church elsewhere in the world.
The word of Christ is a
continual judgement on the Church: “Get behind me, Satan! You are setting your
mind not on divine things but on human things.” But even when the Church goes
astray the call of God remains. The keys given to Peter to bind and loose are
also the keys of judgement on Peter.
But judgement is for salvation, always calling the Church back to its true path.
The story of our failures and
sins, seen from the resurrection, becomes the story of God’s mercy and grace.
It is necessary that this story be told! The story that says, here, where I
went wrong, was where God was waiting to save me. And this is not only our
individual stories, but also the story of the Church. The Church is the
community that repents and is saved.
The way of the cross, which
seems madness and nonsense, is revealed in the light of the resurrection as a
positive choice for the gospel. This is the Church’s calling, and it is our
calling. And when we go astray, and we do, Christ is present in judgement but
for our salvation, to call us back to the way we must follow, which is his way,
the way of the cross which alone leads to resurrection and the Kingdom of God.
No comments:
Post a Comment